AIMS: SPARCL1 was recently identified as a biomarker of right ventricular (RV) maladaptation in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH), and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic protein (NT-proBNP) is an established biomarker of RV failure in PH. The present study investigated whether NT-proBNP and SPARCL1 concentrations are associated with load-independent parameters of RV function and RV-to-pulmonary artery (RV-PA) coupling as measured using invasive pressure-volume (PV) loops in the RV. METHODS: SPARCL1 and NT-proBNP were measured in the plasma of patients with idiopathic pulmonary artery hypertension (IPAH, n = 73). Participants without LV or RV abnormalities served as controls (n = 28). All patients underwent echocardiography and right heart catheterization with invasive PV loop measurements. RESULTS: Our cohort had more females with IPAH than the control group (64% vs. 35%; P = 0.01) and was older [69 (interquartile range, IQR 57-76) vs. 51 (IQR 35-62) years; P < 0.001]. SPARCL1 and NT-proBNP levels were significantly higher in patients with IPAH as compared with controls (P < 0.0001). Patients with IPAH and maladaptive RV remodelling had higher SPARCL1 and NT-proBNP concentrations than those with adaptive RV remodelling (P < 0.01). Both SPARCL1 and NT-proBNP were good predictors of maladaptive RV remodelling in receiver operating characteristic analysis [area under the curve (AUC) (AUC(SPARCL1) = 0.75, AUC(NT-proBNP) = 0.72, P = 0.36 for AUC(SPARCL1) vs. AUC(NT-proBNP)]. The combined predictive value of SPARCL1 and NT-proBNP (AUC 0.78, P < 0.001) for maladaptive RV was numerically higher than that of either SPARCL1 or NT-proBNP alone (P = 0.16 for AUC(SPARCL1 + NT-proBNP) vs. AUC(NT-proBNP) and P = 0.18 for AUC(SPARCL1 + NT-proBNP) vs. AUC(SPARC1)). SPARCL1 showed numerically a tendency for a better predictive power than NT-proBNP for parameters of early maladaptive RV remodelling such as RV ejection fraction < 50% (AUC(SPARCL1) = 0.77, AUC(NT-proBNP) = 0.67, P = 0.06 for AUC(SPARCL1) vs. AUC(NT-proBNP)), RV end-diastolic diameter > 42 mm (AUC(SPARCL1) = 0.72, AUC(NT-proBNP) = 0.65, P = 0.19 for AUC(SPARCL1) vs. AUC(NT-proBNP)) and RV end-systolic volume index RVESVI > 31 mL/m(2) (AUC(SPARCL1) = 0.78, AUC(NT-proBNP) = 0.71, PP = 0.10 for AUC(SPARCL1) vs. AUC(NT-proBNP)). CONCLUSIONS: SPARCL1 and NT-proBNP are good predictors of maladaptive RV remodelling and RV-PA uncoupling in IPAH patients. SPARCL1 may be a better predictor of early maladaptive RV remodelling than NT-proBNP.
- Dörr, O.
- Keranov, S.
- van Wickern, P.
- Nef, H.
- Hamm, C.
- Bauer, P.
- Troidl, C.
- Sossalla, S.
- Voss, S.
- Liebetrau, C.
- Richter, M. J.
- Gall, H.
- Seeger, W.
- Ghofrani, A.
- Yogeswaran, A.
- Tello, K.
Keywords
- Ees/Ea
- PV loops
- RV dysfunction
- RV remodelling
- RV–PA coupling
